DAN TAO
  • Home
  • Research
  • MOOC & TED Talks
  • Courses & Readings
  • Researchers & Labs
  • About Me

A special issue on design-based research

4/17/2014

0 Comments

 
2004 Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 
URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/hedp20/39/4#.U1BWd_ldXBw 
2004 Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1)
URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/hlns20/13/1#.U1BbAvldXBw
0 Comments

Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues

4/17/2014

0 Comments

 
Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42.
0 Comments

Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction

4/2/2014

0 Comments

 
Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 199-201.
0 Comments

Design-based research in science education: One step towards methodology

4/2/2014

0 Comments

 
Juuti, K., & Lavonen, J. (2006). Design-based research in science education: One step towards methodology. NORDINA, 4, 54-68.
0 Comments

Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research?

4/2/2014

0 Comments

 
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25.
0 Comments

Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground

4/2/2014

0 Comments

 
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
0 Comments

Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry

4/2/2014

0 Comments

 
The Design-based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
Design-based research (Brown, 1992; Collins, 1992) is an emerging paradigm for the study of learning in context through the systematic design and study of instructional strategies and tools. Good DBR exhibits five characteristics:
  1. the central goals of designing learning environments and developing theories or "prototheories" of learning are intertwined;
  2. development and research take place through continuous cycles of design, enactment, analysis, and redesign (Cobb, 2001; Collins, 1992);
  3. research on designs must lead to sharable theories that help communicate relevant implication to practitioners and other educational designers (cf. Brophy, 2002);
  4. research must account for how designs function in authentic settings; not only document success or failure but also focus on interactions that refine our understanding of the learning issues involved;
  5. the development of such accounts relies on methods that can document and connect processes of enactment to outcomes of interest.

DBR methods focus on designing and exploring the whole range of designed innovations: artifacts as well as less concrete aspects such as activity structures, institutions, scaffolds, and curricula. Importantly, DBR goes beyond merely designing and testing particular interventions. Interventions embody specific theoretical claims about teaching and learning, and reflect a commitment to understanding the relationships among theory, designed artifacts, and practice. At the same time, research on specific interventions can contribute to theories of learning and teaching. (p.5)

In DBR, practitioners and researchers work together to produce meaningful changes in contexts of practice (e.g., classrooms, after-school programs, teacher on-line communities). (p. 6)

The overarching, explicit concern in DBR for using methods that link processes of enactment to outcomes has power to generate knowledge that directly applies to educational practice. The value of attending to context is not simply that it produces a better understanding of an intervention, but also that it can lead to improved theoretical accounts of teaching and learning. The intention of DBR in education is to inquire more broadly into the nature of learning in a complex system and to refine generative or predictive theories of learning. (p. 7)

0 Comments

    Archives

    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    March 2013

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Ability Grouping
    Amabile
    Anthropology
    Collaborative Learning
    Collaborative Problem Solving
    Collaborative Reflection
    Collective Intentionality
    Collective Responsibility
    COP
    Creativity
    Cross-case Analysis
    CSCL
    Csikszentmihalyi
    Data Mining
    DBR
    Discourse
    Emergence
    Ethics
    Group Agency
    Group Cognition
    Group Dynamics
    Interaction Analysis
    John-Stein
    Keith Sawyer
    Lab Research
    Learning Analytics
    Learning Sciences
    Meaning
    Modeling
    Motivation
    Narrative Inquiry
    Networked Flow
    Pbl
    Qualitative Research
    Quantitative Research
    Research
    Research Problem
    Research Question
    Resources
    Sawyer
    Science Education
    Situated Cognition
    Social Learning
    Sociology
    Sternberg
    Structure
    System
    Tips
    Tools
    Transfer
    Video Research

    RSS Feed


Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.